Search This Blog

Total Pageviews

Advertisement

Labels

Showing posts with label environmental destruction. Show all posts

Scarcity and Environmental Degradation Aspect in Conservation


Scarcity and environmental degradation are two pressing issues that have become central the argument for conservation efforts. The concept scarcity refers to the limited availability of resources, whether be water, land, or wildlife. On the other, environmental degradation refers to the decline in the quality of the natural environment due to human activities such as deforestation, pollution, and climate change. Both of these issues are interconnected and pose a significant threat to ecosystems and biodiversity.

 

One key argument for conservation in the face of scarcity and environmental degradation is the need to protect and preserve our natural resources for future generations. human populations continue to grow, the demand for resources such as water, food, and energy also increases. This puts pressure on ecosystems and can lead to overexploitation and depletion of resources. By implementing conservation measures, we can ensure that these resources are managed sustainably and will be available for future generations to enjoy.

 

Additionally, environmental degradation poses a threat to biodiversity and the stability of ecosystems. As habitats are destroyed and species are pushed to extinction, the balance of ecosystems is disrupted, leading to negative consequences for both the environment and human well-being. Conservation efforts aim to protect and restore habitats, promote biodiversity, and mitigate the impacts of environmental degradation. By preserving natural spaces and wildlife, we can help maintain ecosystem services, such as clean water, air, and soil, that are essential for human survival.

 

Moreover, scarcity and environmental degradation can exacerbate social and economic inequalities. For example, communities that rely on natural resources for their livelihoods may suffer disproportionately from the impacts of habitat loss and pollution. Conservation efforts that promote sustainable resource management and support local communities can help alleviate these disparities and build resilience in the face of environmental challenges.

 

In conclusion, the argument for conservation in the face of scarcity and environmental degradation is clear: we must take action to protect and preserve our natural resources for future generations, maintain biodiversity and ecosystem stability, and promote social and economic equity. By working together to address these issues, we can create a more sustainable and resilient future for our planet and all its inhabitants.

𝗦𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗙𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱 𝗜𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗻𝗮 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁

July 2023: The second round of field research and investigations will begin in late July as part of Phase One of the Panguna Mine Legacy Impact Assessment (PMLIA). This work follows a successful first round of field investigations undertaken throughout April and May across impacted areas to identify and assess any environmental impacts of the Panguna mine, as well as any wider social and human rights impacts relating to the mine.

Work for Field Campaign 2 begins on the 24 th of July and will continue until mid-to-late August. Over this time, the scientists will be conducting structural engineering surveys, collecting water quality and geochemical samples, and speaking to people in communities to understand social impacts from the mine.

Ground and aerial surveying known as LiDAR (Light imaging, detection and ranging) surveys took place earlier in July. Data was collected from a plane flying around Panguna, the Port and Arawa township, and up and down the coast. Information was also gathered from weather stations setup for the study.

The field investigations for Field Campaign 2 will be completed across the Panguna Mine affected areas in the Loloho port, in and around the Panguna Mine, the river system including the Kawerong River, Jaba River, Kuneka Creek, and in the delta area.

Field Campaign 2 is the second of three field campaigns that are planned for this year after the Panguna Mine Legacy Impact Assessment was launched by the Autonomous Bougainville Government President in Arawa in December 2022. The field study is an important part of the wider Legacy Impact Assessment which is scheduled to run until mid-2024.

The field investigations for the Impact Assessment will be completed by an experienced team of local and global experts from consulting firm, Tetra Tech Coffey. Tetra Tech Coffey was appointed as the independent primary contractor by the PMLIA Oversight Committee in November 2022. It has a team made up of local Bougainvillean, Papua New Guinean and international experts and scientists. 

Tetra Tech Coffey scientists rely on the support of the local communities to provide safe access to areas for the collection of soil, water, and food data and to directly participate in the process through surveys and engagement.

The Impact Assessment funded by the Panguna Legacy Assessment Company, is an independent assessment of the environmental impacts caused by the mine, and the subsequent social and human rights impacts directly connected to these environmental impacts. The results of the impact assessment will be presented to the Oversight Committee in mid-2024 and will be translated and shared back with impacted communities and the public.

The Impact Assessment process is a neutral process, and participating in this process does not restrict a person's right to participate in any other process. The impact assessment process is not connected to any agenda surrounding the mine re-opening or not re-opening.

From the data collected from the Impact Assessment, recommendations will be made on actions that need to be taken to address any impacts from the mine. No actions will be agreed upon or taken by the Oversight Committee until the Impact Assessment is completed in mid-2024.

Oversight Committee member Bonaventure Kenulei said, “The impact assessment process is progressing well. Important data from communities impacted by the Panguna Mine was successfully collected in Field Campaign 1 and we thank local communities for their support of this process.

“The researchers from Tetra Coffey will be continuing their work with communities to get the access and information they need. It is important the support for the impact assessment continues so Tetra Tech Coffey can gather comprehensive data in Field Campaign 2 and 3 to help inform the final report to the Oversight Committee.”

The Oversight Committee oversees the entire Panguna Mine Legacy Impact Assessment process and includes representatives from the Autonomous Bougainville Government, the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, landowner, clan and community leaders from the affected area, the Human Rights Law Centre, Rio Tinto and Bougainville Copper Limited.
 
_____
 
For additional information on the Panguna Mine Legacy Impact Assessment, please visit the dedicated website: https://bit.ly/44I6FUM 

There are various ways to lodge a Complaint or voice a concern about the assessment process:
• By phone:→+675 71449914
• By email:→ PMLIA.Secretariat@gmail.com
• By mail:→ c-PO Box 313, Waigani
• In person:→ at the PMLIA office, Ioro 2 Community Government Building

How to mourn a forest

The Marind people of West Papua deploy mourning not only to grieve their animal and plant kin but as political resistance

by Sophie Chao + BIO

One torrid afternoon, I journeyed with an Indigenous Marind woman and her family to a patch of razed forest at the edge of the plantation frontier, where workers had cleared the way for oil palm trees. Her name was Circia*. A mother of three in her late 50s, Circia was imposing, but her footsteps were gentle, almost silent when she led us across the wet soils of Merauke, a district in the Indonesian-controlled western half of New Guinea known as West Papua. The patch of former forest that we travelled toward that hot afternoon in May 2016 was a sacred site that belonged to her clan, forming part of the customary territory of the Marind peoples, which today number around 600 families. Though the Marind rely directly on the forest for their everyday livelihoods and subsistence, Circia had not journeyed here with her three children and nine grandchildren to forage or hunt. They had come to mourn.

Towering piles of felled trees surrounded us, ripped from the soil days earlier to make way for a 50,000-hectare oil palm plantation. Among and between the trees lay the bodies of plants and animals who had once inhabited this sacred place. The air was stiflingly hot and still. It was quiet, too, until a distant chainsaw ripped to life. Somewhere in the remaining patches of forest, plantation workers were clearing the way for more oil palm.

I visited Merauke between 2011 and 2019 while doing long-term ethnographic fieldwork with the Marind. I came to learn how they understood the spread of oil palm in their home of West Papua, which has been under Indonesian rule since the 1960s. But during the 18 months that I lived with Marind communities along the upper banks of the Bian River, Circia and her kin taught me something else: the arts of mourning. This was not only a mourning for people, but for trees, animals and ecosystems.

In our age of planetary unravelling, mourning has become a crucial disposition. It is one that allows us to acknowledge and grieve loss, but also to create or revive connections with more-than-human others. In that way, mourning becomes a form of resistance that pushes against human exceptionalism. It reminds us that we share the world with many other kinds of beings, and that these beings also have their own ways of grieving. But the space shared with other species is complicated. We are not just together in the same world, we are tangled up in each other’s lives. Other species live on and in us, they change us, and we change them, too: we breed them, farm them, mutate their genomes, eat them, research them, love them, and kill them. Increasingly, human action is leading to their extinction. Should we not mourn them, too? Acknowledging the relations that sustain or undermine life and death in multispecies worlds means also learning to practise ‘multispecies mourning’.

Cassowary feathers salvaged from an oil palm concession by Marind villagers. Photo by Vembri Waluyas

For Circia and the Marind, multispecies mourning can mobilise pain and grief, especially the grief that comes from witnessing profound ecological changes. But it’s not just a form of commemoration and remembering. Mourning resists the trivialisation of lives that aren’t human and the regimes of violence that make more-than-human deaths seem normal or natural. Mourning the deaths of plants, animals and landscapes, as the Marind do, demands that we rethink which deaths deserve grief, which deaths are morally sanctioned, and which are forgotten altogether. It invites us to consider how we might remember those who must die for us to thrive. But how exactly do you mourn a forest?